Foot and gait assessment: the role of physiotherapy in injury prevention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55892/jrg.v8i19.2793Keywords:
Foot, Alteration, Dysfunction, Assessment, PhysiotherapyAbstract
The human foot is a complex and highly adaptable anatomical structure, composed of bones, joints, ligaments, and muscles, essential for absorbing impacts and adapting to different surfaces during gait. Among its main structures is the medial longitudinal arch, frequently used in the classification of foot types. The gait can be divided into three types: pronated, normal, and supinated. The objective of this study is to analyze the contribution of physiotherapy, highlighting the importance of assessment for the prevention of dysfunctions and the correction of biomechanical alterations related to the foot and gait. This is an integrative literature review. The search for the results took place in October 2025, in the PhysiotherapyEvidenceDatabase (PEDro) and Virtual Health Library (BVS) databases. The following descriptors were used: "Foot x dysfunction", "Physiotherapy x Foot", "Assess x Gait" and their respective standardized translations in the Health Sciences Descriptors (DeCS). These were combined using the Boolean operator AND in the queries. The inclusion criteria for this study were defined as follows: Articles published in Portuguese; between 2015 and 2025; and addressing the topic of foot and gait. The literature demonstrates that functional alterations of the foot can compromise the biomechanics of the entire lower extremity, reinforcing the importance of physiotherapy assessment. In this context, resources such as baropodometry help in identifying pressure peaks and guide interventions such as the use of orthoses. This literature review showed that physiotherapy assessment of the foot and gait is an essential tool for clinical practice, providing a preventive and integrative view of human movement, consolidating physiotherapy as a protagonist in the prevention of dysfunctions and in maintaining the biomechanical integrity of the musculoskeletal system.
Downloads
References
ANDRADE, R.; SANTOS, T. The choice of footwear by amateur runners: characterization and association with the history of self-reported injury. Physiotherapy and Research, São Paulo, v. 29, n. 4, p. 386–396, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1590/18092950/22016129042022pt.
BRAZIL. Ministry of Health. National Health Promotion Policy. 3rd ed. Brasília: Ministry of Health, 2017.
CARRASCO, A.; BIM, C.; LUCAS, W.; SILVA, M. Evaluation of the morphofunctional characteristics of the foot and the habit of walking barefoot in individuals with foot alterations. World Health, São Paulo, v. 47, 2023. Doi: 10.15343/0104-7809.202347e14122022p.
CARVALHO, J.; BERRO, C.; FIORELLI, A. Postural Insoles: Podoposturology: a literature review. Salusvita, Bauru, v. 40, n. 4, p. 82–97, 2021. Doi: https://revistas.unisagrado.edu.br/index.php/salusvita.
COSTA, R. F.; MENDES, L. A.; SANTOS, P. R. The role of the physiotherapist in primary health care: challenges and perspectives. Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia e Saúde Coletiva, v. 9, n. 2, p. 112–120, 2021.
GIORGIO, A.; MONTES, J.; THOMÉ, G.; CYRILLO, F.; CASTELO, L. Relationship between baropodometry, podoscopy and plantigraphy in the evaluation of plantar impression. Journal of the health sciences institute, São Paulo, v. 38, n. 2, p. 155–160, 2020. Doi: https://repositorio.unip.br.
JESUS, A.; COPETTI, F.; SACCOL, M. Plantar pressure parameters, foot type and sensitivity in recruits: a prospective study. Physiotherapy and Research, São Paulo, v. 27, n. 1, p. 45–50, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-950/20001927032020.
MACEDO, R.; Kanashiro, T.; MATTOS, G.; ALCAIDE, A.; RODRIGUES, L.; DOBASHI, E. Interobserver Agreement of Static Methods for Assessing Foot Types in Runners. Brazilian Journal of Orthopedics, São Paulo, v. 54, n. 3, p. 1–6, 2019. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3402464.
NASCIMENTO, A; SILVA, A; CAXIAS, C; PAULA, D; PEREIRA, M. Contributions of Community Experience to Academic Training in Physiotherapy. Revista Ciência Plural. v. 7. N.2, p. 149-162, 2021. Doi:https://periodicos.ufrn.br/rcp/article/view/22620/14200.
NEVES, J.; CIBINELLO, F.; VALENCIANO, P.; FUJISAWA, D. Influence of the medial longitudinal arch on plantar distribution and posterior flexibility. Physiotherapy and Research, São Paulo, v. 26, n. 1, p. 10–15, 2020. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-950/180224270120.
OLIVEIRA, L.; MARANHO, D.; JÚNIOR, A.; DINATO, M.; PAGNANO, R. Reliability of Baropodometry by Wireless Insole in the Gait of Normal Individuals. Acta ortopédica brasileira, São Paulo, v. 29, n. 5, p. 243–247, 2021. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220212905243134.
ROGERIO, F.; GUEDES, D. Reproducibility and agreement between different dynamic baropodometry protocols during gait: a preliminary study. Physiotherapy and Research, São Paulo, v. 27, n. 2, p. 123–129, 2020. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-2950/17018227042020.
SANTOS, J.; MANFIO, E.; CARPES, F.; BEZERRA, E.; PALHANO, R.; ÁVILA, A. The change in the pronation angle of the subtalar joint influences the distribution of plantar pressure. Brazilian Journal of Kinanthropometry and Human Performance, Florianópolis, v. 19, n. 3, p. 316–324, 2017. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2017v19n3p316.
SILVA, J. M.; ALMEIDA, C. P. The expansion of the field of Physiotherapy in the context of Brazilian public health. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences, v. 15, n. 1, p. 45–54, 2020.
YOON, K.; DOO, P. Effects of ankle mobilization and active stretching on the difference in weight distribution, low back pain and flexibility in individuals with pronated feet. Journal of exercise rehabilitation, [s.l.], v. 9, no. 2, p. 1–7, 2013.Doi: http://dx.doi.o rg/10.12965/jer.130013.






































