Early cutaneous melanoma: clinical and dermoscopic criteria for early diagnosis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55892/jrg.v9i20.3168

Keywords:

Cutaneous melanoma, Early diagnosis, Dermoscopy, Clinical criteria, Skin cancer

Abstract

Cutaneous melanoma is the most aggressive form of skin cancer, accounting for the majority of deaths related to cutaneous neoplasms despite its lower incidence. Early diagnosis is the main determinant of favorable clinical outcomes, particularly when lesions are identified at initial stages. This study aimed to analyze the main clinical and dermoscopic criteria used for the early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma, highlighting their applicability and limitations. This is a qualitative narrative literature review conducted through a structured search in the PubMed, SciELO, and ScienceDirect databases, including studies published in the last 10 years. A total of 19 articles that met the predefined inclusion criteria were selected and critically analyzed, being organized into thematic categories. The results indicate that clinical criteria, such as the ABCDE rule and the “ugly duckling” sign, play an important role in initial screening; however, they present limited sensitivity in detecting early or atypical melanomas. Dermoscopy proved to be superior to clinical examination alone, increasing diagnostic accuracy, although its effectiveness depends on the examiner’s experience and may be limited in lesions with low expression of structural criteria. Dermoscopic algorithms contribute to the standardization of lesion assessment but are not fully effective in all clinical scenarios. In addition, thin melanomas and the so-called featureless melanoma represent significant diagnostic challenges and are often associated with false-negative results. Complementary methods, including digital dermoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy, and artificial intelligence, show promising potential, although they still face limitations regarding standardization and clinical applicability. It is concluded that the early diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma requires an integrated approach combining clinical criteria, dermoscopy, and complementary methods in order to improve diagnostic sensitivity and specificity and reduce morbidity and mortality associated with the disease.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Laura Prata Rodrigues da Cunha Resende, Universidade de Uberaba (Uniube)

Médica pela Universidade de Uberaba (Uniube)

Júlia Cristina Caverçan Gomes, Centro Universitário FACISB

Graduação em Medicina

Renata Trindade Gonçalves, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)

Graduação em Medicina – Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF). Especialização em Dermatologia – Universidade de Brasília (UnB)

Felipe Veiga Kezam Gabriel, Universidade de Santo Amaro

Medicina pela Universidade de Santo Amaro. Residência Médica em Dermatologia pelo Hospital do Servidor Público Municipal. Pós Graduação em Nutrologia pelo Instituto BWS

References

ALJANABI, M. et al. A review ABCDE evaluated the model for decision by dermatologists for skin lesions using bee colony. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, v. 745, 2020.

BORRONI, R. G. et al. Long-term sequential digital dermoscopy of low-risk patients may not improve early diagnosis of melanoma compared to periodical handheld dermoscopy. Cancers, v. 15, n. 4, 2023.

CONFORTI, C.; ZALAUDEK, I. Epidemiology and risk factors of melanoma: a review. Dermatology Practical & Conceptual, 2020.

DIKA, E. et al. Diagnostic efficacy of digital dermoscopy and clinical evaluation in thin melanoma. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 2017.

DINNES, J. et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy for diagnosing cutaneous melanoma in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2018.

HARRINGTON, E.; CLYNE, B.; MORRISSEY, M. Diagnosing malignant melanoma in ambulatory care: a systematic review. British Journal of General Practice, 2017.

IANOȘI, S. L. et al. The importance of dermoscopy in early recognition of melanoma in situ. Current Health Sciences Journal, v. 45, n. 4, 2019.

LAMPITELLI, S. et al. Identification of novel dermoscopic patterns for “featureless melanoma”: clinical-pathological correlation. Dermatology Practical & Conceptual, v. 13, n. 2, 2023.

LEE, M. P.; ZULLO, S. W.; ETZKORN, J. R. Cells to surgery quiz: July 2019. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, v. 139, 2019.

LUCAS, A. S. et al. A guide for dermatology nurses to assist in the early detection of skin cancer. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, v. 6, n. 10, 2016.

OKUBOYEJO, D.; OLUGBARA, O. A review of prevalent methods for automatic skin lesion diagnosis. Journal of Medical Systems, 2018.

PODOLEC, K. et al. Dermoscopic features in different dermatopathological stages of melanoma. Advances in Dermatology and Allergology, 2019.

PHILLIPS, M. et al. Detection of malignant melanoma using artificial intelligence: a systematic review. British Journal of Dermatology, 2019.

THOMAS, L.; PUIG, S. Dermoscopy, digital dermoscopy and other diagnostic tools in melanoma detection. Acta Dermato-Venereologica, 2017.

CHAPPUIS, P. et al. Dermoscopy: a useful tool for general practitioners in melanoma detection. Swiss Medical Weekly, 2016.

GUTMAN, D. et al. Skin lesion analysis toward melanoma detection: a challenge at the international symposium on biomedical imaging. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2016.

Published

2026-04-15

How to Cite

SIMÕES, L. J. L.; RESENDE, L. P. R. da C.; GOMES, J. C. C.; GONÇALVES, R. T.; GABRIEL, F. V. K. Early cutaneous melanoma: clinical and dermoscopic criteria for early diagnosis. JRG Journal of Academic Studies, Brasil, São Paulo, v. 9, n. 20, p. e093168, 2026. DOI: 10.55892/jrg.v9i20.3168. Disponível em: http://www.revistajrg.com/index.php/jrg/article/view/3168. Acesso em: 16 apr. 2026.

ARK